contact@watkinslawfirm.com |  
(205) 701-5536
English

Our Blog

Reviewing the U.S. Tax Court ruling in Avrahami v. Commissioner involving an 831(b) captive insurance company.

Nov 30 -0001

The U.S. Tax Court recently ruled in Avrahami v. Commissioner, involving a captive insurance company under Section 831(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).

The long-awaited Tax Court opinion was ostensibly a victory for the IRS, stating that the arrangement at issue did not involve "insurance" for federal income tax purposes and therefore denying any income tax deduction for the insured business in connection with its payment of insurance premiums to the "micro captive" insurance company.

For federal income tax purposes, "insurance" is defined by the following four factors:
1) risk shifting,
2) risk distribution,
3) insurance risk, and
4) meeting commonly accepted notions of insurance.

The Tax Court held that the second and fourth factors – risk distribution (essentially, the law of large numbers as it relates to insurance risk, where the insurer does not have all of its "eggs," i.e., risk, in one basket) and the commonly accepted notions of insurance, respectively – were not satisfied. Therefore, the risk purported to be insured was deemed not to be insurance.

The Court determined that risk distribution was not satisfied since the number of insureds (primarily brother-sister companies owned by a common parent) was not sufficient to satisfy the concept of risk distribution. In addition, the Court also held that risk distribution in this case was not satisfied through a so-called "pooling arrangement," since the funds that were used to fund the premiums ended up, eventually, being loaned back to the owners of the parent company/insured (i.e., the taxpayers, through a "circular flow of funds"), and because the premiums paid for the insurance that was pooled were deemed to be unreasonable. A pooling arrangement is designed to allow an insurance company that does not have sufficient third-party premium/risk on its own to "share" risk with other insurance companies and therefore distribute its risk among sufficient third parties.

Rate this item
(1 Vote)
Super User

Super User

Blog Use: Disclaimer

**This blog site is published on behalf of and reflects the personal views of the article authors, in their individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of the law firm or any clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them. The purpose of this blog site is to assist in dissemination of information about general business and interesting legal topics, but no representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this blog site is provided only as general information for education purposes, and blog topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

**By using this blog site you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blog site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This blog site is not intended to be advertising and Joshua M. Watkins does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blog site in a state where this blog site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

**No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

 

In a world that has become increasingly complicated and uncertain, you deserve an attorney who is result-oriented, responsive and respected. 

 

 

Contact Info

4000 Eagle Point Corporate Dr. 
Birmingham, AL 35242

(205) 701-5536

 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Office Hours 9.00 am to 5.00 pm
By Appointment Only

Twitter Feed

"...the Franchise Rule [hopefully] gives prospective purchasers of franchises the material information they need... https://t.co/dMDK075HJg
"...the Court’s [recent] decision is beneficial for the industry to provide direction on how to structure their... https://t.co/faPJOKU9Z5
Follow Joshua Watkins on Twitter